Parcel and Postal Technology International
  • News
    • A-E
      • Automation
      • Business Diversification
      • Construction / Development
      • Cross-border
      • Delivery
      • E-commerce
      • Expo
    • F-O
      • Freight
      • IT & Systems
      • Last Mile
      • Lockers / PUDO
      • Logistics
      • Mail
      • Operations
    • P-R
      • Packets
      • Parcels
      • Peak
      • Retail
      • Returns
    • S-Z
      • Sorting Systems
      • Staff / Personnel
      • Sustainability
      • Technology
      • Vehicles / Fleet
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    • March 2025
    • September 2023
    • June 2023
    • March 2023
    • December 2022
    • SHOWCASE 2019
    • Archive Issues
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Analysis
  • Awards
    • 2025 Awards
    • Previous Winners
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Parcel + Post Expo
LinkedIn YouTube Twitter
  • Sign-up for Breaking News Emails
  • Meet the Editors
  • Contact Us
  • Media Pack
Subscribe
LinkedIn Facebook
Parcel and Postal Technology International
  • News
      • Automation
      • Business Diversification
      • Construction / Development
      • Cross-border
      • Delivery
      • E-commerce
      • Expo
      • Freight
      • IT & Systems
      • Last Mile
      • Lockers / PUDO
      • Logistics
      • Mail
      • Operations
      • Packets
      • Parcels
      • Peak
      • Retail
      • Returns
      • Sorting Systems
      • Staff / Personnel
      • Sustainability
      • Technology
      • Vehicles / Fleet
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    1. December 2024
    2. September 2024
    3. June 2024
    4. March 2024
    5. SHOWCASE 2019
    6. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    April 2, 2025

    In this Issue – March 2025

    Online Magazines By Web Team
    Recent

    In this Issue – March 2025

    April 2, 2025

    In this Issue – December 2024

    December 5, 2024

    In this Issue – September 2024

    September 19, 2024
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Analysis
  • Awards
    • 2025 Awards
    • 2024 Award Winners
    • 2023 Award Winners
    • 2022 Award Winners
    • 2021 Award Winners
    • 2020 Award Winners
    • 2019 Award Winners
    • Previous Winners
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Parcel + Post Expo
LinkedIn Facebook
Subscribe
Parcel and Postal Technology International
Opinion

Get it right first time

Matthew Robertson, Co-CEO at NetDespatchBy Matthew Robertson, Co-CEO at NetDespatchApril 29, 20196 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

Failed deliveries cost industry US$2bn each year – what can be done about it? Matthew Robertson, Co-CEO at NetDespatch, explores the issue

Research by online retail association IMRG and parcel data management platform NetDespatch quantified the cost of failed online retail deliveries for industry, looking at the financial impact for the three main groups involved – shoppers, retailers and carriers. While there may be any number of reasons as to why a customer’s home delivery expectations may not be met, this research focused on the four most common delivery failure scenarios:

1.      Failed first delivery – re-delivery required

2.      Failed first delivery – collection by customer

3.      Late delivery – not within the expected time window

4.      Order lost – replacement sent

IMRG and NetDespatch estimated the cost of failed first-time, on-time, every-time delivery for all three groups combined to be more than £1.6bn (US$2bn) in 2018.

Have failed delivery rates improved?

Statistically-speaking, the answer is yes, but the actual picture is more complex. In the IMRG-MetaPack UK Delivery Index, one of the metrics tracked is the level of attempted [or carded] delivery. In 2014 this averaged 4.65%. The rolling average over the most recent 12 months [March 2018 to February 2019] is 2.77% – a substantial improvement.

A core reason for this improvement is likely to be related to the introduction of new solutions over the intervening years. There is of course always a lag between solutions coming to market and adoption by retailers/customers but, as time moves on, the ones that gain traction can start to enhance efficiency and the customer experience.

Some of the most important improvements have enabled greater visibility of order movements and more dynamic control of delivery operations, meaning delivery times can now be more accurately predicted and communicated to the customer. In some cases, customers also have the option to defer delivery to a more convenient time or place and, of course, use of alternative click and collect locations has become far more popular.

In spite of such innovations and technologies, the cost of failed ‘first-time, on-time, every-time’ delivery remains high because shopper expectations tend to increase in line with – or, in many cases, faster than) – retailer adoption of them.

The move toward faster delivery

One of the main challenges with delivery is that it has sped up considerably in recent years. Whether this is something that people specifically want – or is something they are being told they can have – is a moot point, but the shift is clear to see.

In the IMRG-MetaPack index, the percentage of orders being sent specified-day/next-day has increased from 43.9% of all UK-delivered volume in July 2016 to 50.2% in July 2018. That might not sound like much, but it means carriers were expected to deliver about 580 million next-day deliveries in 2018, compared with 450 million in 2016. This brings challenges because economy services typically allow for a two- to three-day delivery window, with some in-built contingency, while next-day only allows perhaps a 12-hour delivery window, with very little available contingency.

How can the risk of failed delivery be reduced?

Here are three possible focus areas for how the risk of failed deliveries could be reduced:

1. Encourage collection over receipt

In the UK, we have a culture of home delivery; almost 80% of respondents to a survey IMRG ran in 2018 with GFS and maru/EDR said that home was their preferred delivery location. The main issue with this is that most people are not at home during the day, when their deliveries are likely to arrive.

The pressure to deliver on-time in line with expectation means a portion of parcels are fulfilled to a ‘safe space’; some are elected by the customer, but in many cases this means it has been left with a neighbor. This may technically reduce failed deliveries, but it’s also quite annoying for people to have to continually apologize to their neighbors for taking their parcels in. From the perspective of customer experience, it cannot be considered a long-term solution.

Connecting people to their parcel is the aim of delivery; incentivizing greater use of click-and-collect so customers are more focused on collecting rather than receiving their orders – and hence have more control over the process – may provide opportunities to reduce failed deliveries. This would require the evolution of the click-and-collect infrastructure, but the benefits seem to support it.

2. In-transit data

Another solution would be greater adoption and use of in-transit data, so customers have clear visibility of where their orders are – probably supported by text message updates at key points – and increase their chances of being available – or having someone available – to accept receipt of the parcel at the exact moment of delivery.

While WISMO [where is my order] functionality is not yet widely adopted, it does seem an inevitable route down which technology may develop, becoming cheaper to implement and offer over time.

3. Putting the customer in control of their delivery

Instead of automatically giving customers a next-day delivery option, retailers need to make the customer the center of the delivery process. One way of doing this is allowing customers to be able to choose their own delivery window. If customers are able to choose their desired time window for their delivery, it automatically makes the delivery process more convenient for them and can potentially reduce the risk of a failed first-time delivery.

From the point of order through to the fulfillment lifecycle, regular communication between the customer and the courier is key to increase the chances of a successful first-time delivery. This is because the customer can ensure that they are at home during their requested time slot, or if their plans change, they are able to notify the courier and update their preference for a different delivery slot.

About the author

Matthew Robertson is co-CEO at NetDespatch. With a career spanning over 20 years in the general distribution and postal industry, Robertson was instrumental in the adoption and implementation of NetDespatch in the Packets and Parcels division at TNT Post in his three years as group development director. He was also instrumental in the adoption and implementation of NetDespatch in the Packets and Parcels division of the leading alternative B2C postal service. Robertson has also held senior positions at Arla Foods and a leading role in market development for B2C packets within Royal Mail. Robertson is recognized as an industry leader with a strong commercial presence and provides a key link between NetDespatch clients and the business.

Share. Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Email
Previous ArticleNexpad concept by Imaginactive
Next Article Amazon sets a new US standard with Prime next-day

Related Posts

Opinion

OPINION: How Chinese CEP giants are shaping the future of Europe’s last-mile logistics

May 14, 20255 Mins Read
Opinion

OPINION: The impact of open smart locker networks on the future of parcel logistics

April 23, 20254 Mins Read
Opinion

OPINION: The challenges of expanding out-of-home delivery in the UK

April 2, 20255 Mins Read

Receive breaking stories and features in your inbox each week, for free


Enter your email address:


Latest News

Royal Mail adds 7,000th electric vehicle to fleet

May 16, 2025

Australia Post warns customers about rising number of parcel scam messages

May 16, 2025

DHL adds 30,000m2 warehouse to health logistics campus in Germany

May 16, 2025
Getting in Touch
  • Contact Us / Advertiser
  • Meet the Editors
  • Download Media Pack
  • Breaking News Emails
Our Social Channels
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Supplier Spotlights
  • Tiramizoo GmbH
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Notice & Takedown Policy
  • Site FAQs
© 2025 UKi Media & Events a division of UKIP Media & Events Ltd

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.

CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie records the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie records the user consent for the cookies in the "Analytics" category.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe GDPR Cookie Consent plugin sets the cookie to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie records the user consent for the cookies in the "Necessary" category.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie stores user consent for cookies in the category "Others".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie stores the user consent for cookies in the category "Performance".
elementorneverThe website's WordPress theme uses this cookie. It allows the website owner to implement or change the website's content in real-time.
JSESSIONIDsessionNew Relic uses this cookie to store a session identifier so that New Relic can monitor session counts for an application.

Functional

Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.

CookieDurationDescription
__cf_bm30 minutesCloudflare set the cookie to support Cloudflare Bot Management.

Analytics

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

CookieDurationDescription
CONSENT2 yearsYouTube sets this cookie via embedded YouTube videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
uidsessionThis is a Google UserID cookie that tracks users across various website segments.
vuid1 year 1 month 4 daysVimeo installs this cookie to collect tracking information by setting a unique ID to embed videos on the website.
_ga1 year 1 month 4 daysGoogle Analytics sets this cookie to calculate visitor, session and campaign data and track site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognise unique visitors.
_ga_*1 year 1 month 4 daysGoogle Analytics sets this cookie to store and count page views.

Advertisement

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.

CookieDurationDescription
OAGEOsessionOpenX sets this cookie to avoid the repeated display of the same ad.
OAID1 yearCookie set to record whether the user has opted out of the collection of information by the AdsWizz Service Cookies.
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE5 months 27 daysYouTube sets this cookie to measure bandwidth, determining whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSCsessionYoutube sets this cookie to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devicesneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the user's video preferences using embedded YouTube videos.
yt-remote-device-idneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the user's video preferences using embedded YouTube videos.
yt.innertube::nextIdneverYouTube sets this cookie to register a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
yt.innertube::requestsneverYouTube sets this cookie to register a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.

Others

Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

CookieDurationDescription
VISITOR_PRIVACY_METADATA5 months 27 daysDescription is currently not available.

SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by